The Netherlands is set to impose new rules that would see asylum seekers cut off from food and shelter after “a few weeks” if their application is rejected. While Germany opened up its doors to make it easier for those arriving at its borders and France criticised Hungary over its new 110-mile razor wire fence, the Dutch government was going in a different direction.
From November, any migrant who refused refugee status or humanitarian protection will be given less than a month before they are deported or told to fend for themselves. As part of the measures, the government wants to shut down 30 regional “bed, bath and bread” centres where asylum seekers can find shelter, regardless of the status of their application.
The move has been seen as a political attempt to draw voters from the popular, anti-immigration party of Geert Wilders. It won’t apply to those who agree to return home by their own steam, who would be catered for by six larger, national centres.
Only two EU countries have similar strict measures in place to deny basic support to failed asylum seekers – Finland and Britain. In the UK, the Government wants to go one step further and deny benefits to those with families.
The Netherlands received 18,790 applications for asylum in 2014, according to Eurostat. Of those, 6,240 were rejected outright and would therefore be cast out under the new rules. Prime Minister Mark Rutte has defended the measures, saying it was “crazy” to offer indefinite assistance to those who failed to qualify as refugees.
“We are talking about the group that can go back, whose governments would take them back, but they don’t want to go back,” he said. “As long as they are in the Netherlands, they have to enjoy minimum standards of living,” said Ion Diaconu, who helped write a UN report criticising the Dutch policy proposal.
In Britain, more than 60 per cent of asylum applications are rejected. Most people then have a right to an appeal, but the majority still receive negative decisions. The cost of then ejecting people forcibly is expensive, leading to accusations that the Government is deliberately making life as difficult as possible for failed asylum seekers to force people to leave.
Copyright © Independent Print Limited